Tuesday, March 24, 2026
๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ
Adaptive Perspectives, 7-day Insights
Technology

FCC Bans Foreign Routers. Almost None Are Made Here.

The FCC added all foreign-made consumer routers to its Covered List, banning new models from sale in the US. The problem: virtually no consumer routers are manufactured domestically.

FCC Bans Foreign Routers. Almost None Are Made Here.

Note: This post was written by Claude Opus 4.6. The following is a synthesis of reporting from major technology and security news organizations.

On Sunday, the FCC updated its Covered List to include all consumer-grade routers manufactured outside the United States. New foreign-made models are now prohibited from receiving FCC equipment authorization โ€” which means they cannot be legally imported, marketed, or sold in the US.

Security journalist Brian Krebs was among the first to flag the obvious problem: banning foreign-made consumer routers doesn’t leave American consumers with many options, because almost no one makes consumer routers in America.

What the FCC Did

A White House-convened interagency body determined that foreign-produced routers “pose unacceptable risks to the national security of the United States.” The determination cited two specific threats: a supply chain vulnerability that could disrupt the economy, critical infrastructure, and national defense, and a cybersecurity risk that could “immediately and severely disrupt US critical infrastructure and directly harm US persons.”

FCC Chair Brendan Carr stated: “I welcome this Executive Branch national security determination… Following President Trump’s leadership, the FCC will continue to do our part in making sure that US cyber space, critical infrastructure, and supply chains are safe and secure.”

The agency pointed to the Volt Typhoon, Flax Typhoon, and Salt Typhoon campaigns โ€” Chinese state-sponsored operations that exploited router vulnerabilities to infiltrate American infrastructure โ€” as justification for the sweeping action.

The Manufacturing Problem

The ban is sweeping because the definition of “foreign-made” is sweeping. It doesn’t matter where a company is headquartered โ€” it matters where the hardware is physically built. That’s a problem because the entire consumer router industry manufactures overseas:

BrandHQManufacturing
TP-LinkChinaVietnam
AsusTaiwanTaiwan
NetgearUSAsia
LinksysUSChina, Asia
Eero (Amazon)USAsia
Google Nest WifiUSAsia
D-LinkTaiwanAsia

As Krebs observed on LinkedIn, the ban extends well beyond the Chinese manufacturers like Huawei and ZTE that were already on the Covered List. It captures routers built in allied nations โ€” Taiwan, Vietnam, Thailand โ€” and American-designed products assembled abroad.

The only consumer router reportedly manufactured in the US is Starlink’s newer Wi-Fi router, built in Texas.

What’s Exempt

Existing authorized models can still be sold. Previously purchased routers are unaffected. Software updates are guaranteed through at least March 1, 2027, with a possible extension. Manufacturers can apply for Conditional Approval from the Department of War or DHS by emailing conditional-approvals@fcc.gov โ€” but applicants must disclose their management structures, supply chains, and submit plans to shift at least some manufacturing to the United States.

No timeline exists for how long Conditional Approval takes. For context, the FCC’s December 2025 drone ban โ€” which used a similar conditional approval framework โ€” had approved only four systems as of the announcement.

Security Theater or Industrial Policy?

The security concerns are real. Router compromises are a genuine threat vector, and the Typhoon campaigns demonstrated the damage state-sponsored actors can inflict through consumer networking equipment. But several analysts questioned whether this particular action addresses the actual problem.

The 5Gstore team put it bluntly: “A rule that bans new foreign router models while leaving millions of existing foreign-made devices completely untouched does not make US networks measurably more secure today.” They argued that real security measures would look like mandatory firmware audits, annual reauthorization, or patching attestation standards for devices already installed โ€” not a forward-looking import ban.

The Register noted a layer of irony: US intelligence agencies were previously caught intercepting Cisco routers in transit and installing espionage firmware โ€” the exact supply chain attack the FCC claims to be preventing.

And there’s a practical timeline problem. No domestic manufacturing capacity exists at scale. Building it will take years. In the meantime, consumers face a market where no new router models arrive on shelves โ€” leaving everyone running hardware that gets older by the month.

What This Means for You

Nothing changes today. Your current router still works. Existing models already on store shelves remain legal to sell. But if you’re planning a network upgrade in the next year or two, the selection will only shrink from here โ€” at least until manufacturers build US production lines or navigate the Conditional Approval process.

Sources